      |
|---|
|
|
|
[Expert Witness
Engagements] [Arbitration
Engagements] [Mediation Engagements] [Legal/Litigation Engagements] |
 |
Miller - Class Action v. Bank Of America
Jurisdiction: San Francisco Superior Court Client: Miller (Class Action) Nature Of Case: Miller (Class Action) claims that Bank Of America did not properly process Checking accounts with Social Security Direct Deposit activity. The class-action case, filed 5 1/2 years ago, centers on allegations that Bank of America collected some customer service fees by siphoning money from direct deposit accounts set up to receive Social Security benefits. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Declaration. Testimony at Trial. Damages Expert Designated Technical Expert concerning production of computerized account records. Design, build and operate relational data base system to analyze 50 million records produced in electronic form by Bank Of America. Represented by: The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF Status: Complete February, 2004. |
|
Department 56 v. Arthur Anderson
Jurisdiction: Minnesota, Hennepin County Client: Arthur Anderson LLP Nature Of Case: Department 56 claims that Arthur Anderson committed fraud while assisting Department 56 in the selection and implementation of J. D. Edwards ERP software system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Litigation Support. Review software selection process. Review project management. Review policy implications of new software system implementation. Represented by: Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott-Chicago, IL Status: Complete February 2002 |
|
All Pro Sound v. Netsirk Technologies
Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit Court - Escambia County Client: All Pro Sound Nature Of Case: All Pro purchased SAP Business One software and contracted with Netsirk to advice All Pro on the selection and to install the SAP software. All Pro claims that Netsirk never installed SAP software thatr satisfied the business needs of All Pro. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Represented by: McDonald Fleming Moorhead Status: Pre trial discovery |
|
Tri Valley Growers v. Oracle Corporation
Jurisdiction: San Francisco Superior Court Client: Tri-Valley Growers Nature Of Case: Tri Valley Growers purchased a Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) software system from Oracle Corporation. TVG alleges that the software was defective, did not meet its needs and was never completely installed. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and evaluate Oracle management decision making process, development planning and project management. Represented by: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN Status: Complete January 2002 |
|
Orion IP V. Staples, Inc., et al
Jurisdiction: US District - Marshall TX. Client: Toyota, Harley Davidson, Home Depot Nature Of Case: Orion IP Claims Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,367,627 COMPUTER-ASSISTED PARTS SALES METHOD - Johnson Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony Represented by: Vinson & Elkins, McDermott Will & Emery, Fulbright & Jaworski Status: Complete March 2006 |
|
Farmers Group, Inc. v. Guerrero
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District Client: Guerrero, Rene Nature Of Case: Farmers Insurance Group alleges that an Internet gripe site maintained by Guerrero (1) Service Mark Infringement. (2) Unfair Competition. (3) Service Mark Dilution. (4) Unfair Competition And Unfair Or Deceptive Acts. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report Represented by: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane Status: Complete January 2006 |
|
Westlake Chemical Corporation and Westlake Management Services, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation, Experio Solutions Corporation and Grant Thornton LLP.
Jurisdiction: Texas-District Court of Harris County Client: Westlake Chemical Corporation Nature Of Case: Westlake claims that Oracle, Experio and Grant Thornton were to blame for the failed implementation of Oracle eProcurement and SAP Connector integration software. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Represented by: Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston Status: Complete April 2003 |
|
Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. v. CAP Gemini America, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Ohio-Northern District Client: CAP Gemini America, Inc. Nature Of Case: Pioneer claims that CAP Gemini contributed to a failed IMI ESS - Oracle Financial Software Selection and Integration. Pioneer Standard claims software was defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Technical Expert. Designated Damages Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial Represented by: Shearman & Sterling-NYC Status: Complete December 2003. |
|
Colorado Department of Higher Education - Colorado Student Loan Program v. Ratheon E-Systems, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Colorado - Denver District Court Client: Colorado Department of Higher Education Nature Of Case: Failed software development. Colorado Deportment of Higher Education claims that Ratheon failed to develop and deliver a system to process student loans for the state. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report Represented by: Hogan & Hartson, LLC. Status: Completed September 2008 |
|
Priority Healthcare Corporation v. Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit - Ninth District Client: Deloitte & Touche LLP Nature Of Case: Priority claims faulty performance by Deloitte during a Computer Software Selection and implementation involving Oracle software and Custom developed applications. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Analysis Represented by: Holland & Knight-Miami Status: Complete September 2005 |
|
TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax V. Manhattan Associates, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Florida-Southern District Client: TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax, Inc. Nature Of Case: Manhattan Associates contracted with TigerDirect for the purchase and installation of a Warehouse Management System designed to handle TigerDirect high order and shipping volumes. Tiger claims that the Manhattan Warehouse for Microsoft Windows system was not capable of supporting the TiderDirect warehouse operation after the system went live. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony Represented by: Holland & Knight - Tampa Status: Complete February 2007 |
|
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions V. Spherion Pacific Workforce
Jurisdiction: US District Court-Minnesota Client: Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions Nature Of Case: The Board of Pensions contracted with Spherion to develop a software system to replace a legacy system. The Board of Pensions claims that Spherion produced a software system that was of little or no value and was a failed software implementation. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Represented by: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN Status: Complete May 2006. |
|
U.S. Bank National Association (Multi Service Corporation) v. PerfectStop Partners
Pier to Pier v. U. S. Bank (MO. State Court)
Jurisdiction: AAA Houston, TX Client: US Bank Nature Of Case: PerfectStop developed an internet based computer system to link aircraft operators with Fixed Base Operators to coordinate trip logistics. US Bank claims that PerfectStop system was never operational. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Analysis/Designation Trial Testimony Represented by: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN Status: Complete March 2009 |
|
The Insurance House Inc. v. Insurance Data Processing, Inc.
Jurisdiction: US District Court Georgia Northern District Client: Insurance Data Processing Nature Of Case: Insurance House claims breach of contract by Insurance Data Processing for the development of a computer system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report Deposition Testimony Represented by: Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersall-Philla, PA Status: Pre trial discovery |
|
Answerthink v. Del Monte Fresh Produce Company
Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit Court-Miami Client: Del Monte Fresh Produce Company Nature Of Case: Answerthink was retained by DelMonte to implement Oracle applications software in the United States and several other countries. DelMonte claims that Answerthink materially breached the agreements. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Represented by: Holland & Knight-Miami Status: Pre-Trial Discovery |
|
Hewlett-Packard Company V. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court - NY Client: Factory Mutual Insurance Nature Of Case: HP claims significant loss due to sabotage by a former employee. Factory Mutual disputes the loss claim. Nature Of Engagement: Consulting Technical expert. Represented by: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi Status: Complete May 2004 |
|
Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. and Gateway, Inc.
Jurisdiction: US District Court - Eastern District Marshall Division Client: Dell, Inc. Nature Of Case: Abstrax claims patent infringement by Dell of patent 6,240,328 entitled entitled “Manufacturing Method for Assembling Products by Generating and Scheduling Dynamically Assembly Instructions Nature Of Engagement: Designated Non-Infringement Expert Expert Report Deposition Testimony Represented by: Vinson & Elkins-Austin, TX Status: Discovery |
|
Computer Horizons v. Spearhead Consultants and SAP America, Inc.
Jurisdiction: New York-Supreme Court - NY County Client: Computer Horizons Corp. Nature Of Case: Computer Horizons purchased SAP software system which was to be customized and installed by Spearhead Systems. Computer Horizons claims software was defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Consulting Technical Expert. Evaluate system requirements, technical structure, data interface, data base structure and system integration structure. Represented by: Proskauer Rose-New York City, NY Status: Complete March 2001. |
|
United Computer Systems, Inc. v. AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Jurisdiction: California-American Arbitration Association-LA Client: AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc Nature Of Case: Computer software system, claims of capabilities and performance. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Testimony at Trial. Analysis of computer system, source code and underlying file structure and operation. Review data base structure. Represented by: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete June 1999. |
|
PHARMACEUTICAL RETURNS SERVICE v. PHARMA LOGISTICS, LTD
Jurisdiction: US District Court - Illinois Client: Pharmaceutical Returns Service Nature Of Case: Pharma developed a computer system to process oudated drugs for return to manufacturers. Pharaceutical Returns Service claims that Pharma used it's trade secrets to develop the system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report Represented by: Bryan Cave - Chicago Status: Completed June 2009 |
|
University of Quebec v. SAP Canada Inc.
Jurisdiction: Canada-Montreal Arbitration Tribunal Client: University of Quebec Nature Of Case: Failed SAP software implementation claimed by University of Quebec. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Represented by: Woods & Partners-Montreal, Canada Status: Complete August 2003 |
|
State Of Arkansas V. SAP Public Services, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Arkansas Circuit Court Client: State Of Arkansas Nature Of Case: The State Of Arkansas contracted with SAP Public Services, Inc. for the purchase of computer software. The State Of Arkansas claims that SAP Public Services failed to provide an integrated Financial Management computer software to handle unique Public Sector requirements. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Represented by: State Of Arkansas - Attorney General Status: Complete August 2008 |
|
State Of Iowa vs. InfoSys, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Iowa District Court-Polk County Client: InfoSys, Inc. Nature Of Case: The State Of Iowa Department of Human Services claims that InfoSys provided a flawed system to perform Medical billing and processing. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Represented by: Holland & Knight-Chicago Status: Completed January 2005 |
|
Texas Department Of Health v. EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company
Jurisdiction: AAA - Dallas, TX Client: EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company Nature Of Case: Texas Department Of Health claims that National Health/EDS improperly billed development and other costs. Determination of substantial completion of installed computer system. Status and significance of CMS audit of State Medicare/Medicaid System. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Trial Testimony Represented by: Hughes & Luce-Dallas Status: Complete October 2004. |
|
Ocean Garden Products, Inc. v. IBM Global Services, a Division of International Business Machines Corporation
Jurisdiction: US District Court-California Southern District Client: IBM Corporation Nature Of Case: Ocean Garden Products claims Breach of Contract and Fraud by IBM during the selection and implementation of the QAD ERP software to replace a non-Y2K compliant legacy system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report.Technology consultant. Represented by: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges-Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete August 2003 |
|
Uncle Henry’s Inc. v. Plaut Consulting Inc. and Edgewing, a Division of Plaut Consulting, Inc.
Jurisdiction: US District Court - Maine Client: Plaut Consulting, Inc. Nature Of Case: Uncle Henry's claims Breach of Contract for the development of a classified advertising eCommerce Web Site using a Microsoft development environment. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Internet Technology consultant. Represented by: Lynch, Brewer, Hoffman & Sands-Boston, MA and Verrill & Dana - Portland Me Status: Complete April 2003. |
|
La Touraine, Inc. v. Navisite, Inc., Formerly known as Jupiter Hosting, Inc.
Jurisdiction: American Arbitration Association-San Francisco Client: La Touraine, Inc. Nature Of Case: La Touraine contracted with Navisite to develop an Internet website Content Management System (CMS) and to host a number of websites operated by LaTouraine. LaTouraine claims that the CMS developed by Navisite was incomplete and had been misrepresented. LaTouraine claims that Navisite shut down LaTouraine websites. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report Deposition Testimony Trial Testimony Represented by: Asaro Keagy Status: Complete - January 2009 |
|
Cornn, et. Al- Class Action. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Jurisdiction: California-Northern District Client: Class Action Plaintiffs Nature Of Case: Plaintiffs claim that UPS failed to pay them for various classes of time worked. Nature Of Engagement: Expert consultant Damages Data Base Expert Technical expert concerning production of computerized work and payroll records. Design, load and operate relational data base system to process and analyze 400 million records produced in electronic form. Represented by: Kershaw, Cutter, Ratinoff & York Status: Complete January 2007 |
|
Styling Technology Corporation v. Arthur Anderson LLP et. al.
Jurisdiction: Arizona-Superior Court Maricopa County Client: Styling Technology Corporation Nature Of Case: Styling Technology retained Arthur Anderson to design and implement Oracle financial systems. Styling claims that Arthur Anderson failed to deliver in a timely manner and when delivered, the system failed to work. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Analysis of Oracle system selection and implementation. Represented by: Grant & Eisenhofer Status: Complete December 2003. |
|
Medinformatix, Inc. V. AcerMed, Inc.
Jurisdiction: JAMS - Los Angeles California Client: AcerMED Inc. Nature Of Case: Mediformatix claims that Acermed infringed it's Copyright on a Medical Office management system developed by Medinformatix when AcerMed developed a competing system. Medinformatix also claims that Acermed misappropriated its trade secrets relating to the Microsoft SQL data base used by the AcerMed system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony Trial Testimony Review and evaluate Microsoft SQL data bases used by both systems. Represented by: Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA Status: Complet March 2007. |
|
ChartOne, Inc. v. Netcube Systems, Inc.
Jurisdiction: AAA - San Jose Client: ChartOne, Inc. Nature Of Case: Failed software implementation. ChartOne alleges that Netcube failed to fulfill its obligations during an engagement involving PeopleSoft computer software. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Represented by: Miller Morton Caillat & Nevis-SJ Status: Complete June 2004 |
|
Computer Business Applications, Inc. v. Melville Corporation
Jurisdiction: California-Central District Client: Computer Business Applications, Inc. - Plaintiff./Cross Defendant Nature Of Case: Contracts dispute involving claims that a merchandising software system was defective. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. Review system technology, implementation issues, possible defects, corrective efforts, costs and impacts. Represented by: Perkins Coie-Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete September 1994. |
|
Mulligan - Class Action v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Jurisdiction: California Superior Court-Alameda County Client: Mulligan - Class Rep. Nature Of Case: PacBell is accused of erroneously charging Wire Pro inside wiring maintenance charges Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Design relational data base to collect and analyze information for 7 million users of the PacBell Wirepro service. Represented by: The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF Status: Complete June 2004. |
|
DE Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.
Jurisdiction: US Virginia - Wester District Client: DE Tech Nature Of Case: De Tech claims infringement of United States Patents Nos. 6,460,020 and 6,845,364 ("the '020 Patent" and "the '364 Patent" respectively) both entitled "Universal Shopping Center for International Operation." Nature Of Engagement: Damages Data base Consultant. Consultant for acquisition of damages data from Dell data bases. Create damages data base. Represented by: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi Status: Complete - December 2006 |
|
Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company v. Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and Gateway, Inc.
Jurisdiction: US District - Marshall TX. Client: Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company Nature Of Case: Intergraph claims infringement of it's Patent 4,899,275 entitled Cache-MMU System; Patent 4,933,835 entitled Apparatus for Maintaining Consistency of a Cache Memory with a Primary Memory and Patent 5,091,846 entitled Cache Providing Caching/Non-Caching Write-Through and Copyback Modes … Nature Of Engagement: Damages data base data verification consultant Represented by: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi Status: Complete August 2004. |
|
Harp - Class Action v. Quest Communications
Jurisdiction: Oregon-Circuit Court Multnomah County Client: Harp - Class Rep. Nature Of Case: Quest Communications is accused of erroneously charging roaming charges for Cellular phone calls. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Damage Calculations From Computerized Records Represented by: Northwest Lawfirm-Portland, OR Status: Complete April 2005 |
|
IEA Software, Inc. and Community ISP, Inc. v. Whole ISP, Brian Krabach; Todd Meyers
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District Client: Community ISP Nature Of Case: Community ISP alleges Copyright Infringement regarding software program, data bases and text manuals. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report Represented by: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane Status: Complete January 2005 |
|
Reference Pathology Services, Inc. v. Soft Computer Consultants
Jurisdiction: Florida-American Arbitration Association-Tampa Client: Reference Pathology Services, Inc. Nature Of Case: Failed Medical Laboratory Software implementation. Issues included system architecture, system functional capabilities, data conversion, system bugs and system reliability. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. Represented by: Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa Status: Complete February 2003 |
|
Move Management, Inc. v. Relocation Management Worldwide, Inc. and Armstrong Transfer and Storage Company, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Colorado-Jefferson County Client: Move Management, Inc. Nature Of Case: Move Management claims that Relocation Management used Move Management Trade Secrets during the development of a competing Web Site. Nature Of Engagement: Neutral Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review and compare Web sites, source code and SQL data bases. Represented by: Brownstein Hyatt & Farber-Denver; Schwartz & Goldberg-Denver; Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs-Memphis Status: Complete December 2003. |
|
Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. v. AT & T Corporation
Jurisdiction: AAA - New York City Client: Verizon Business Networks Nature Of Case: Verizon claims that AT & T wrongfully terminated it's contract to provide support for networks operated by At & T. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Represented by: DLA Piper Status: Complete- March 2008 |
|
Parrot Ice Products v. Oracle Corporation
Jurisdiction: Texas-District Court of Harris County Client: Parrot Ice Products, Inc. Nature Of Case: Failed software selection. Parrot Ice claims that Oracle Corporation represented that the Oracle applications software could be used to operate the business. Parrot Ice claims that the software sold to Parrot was not applicable to its business and could not be used. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Represented by: Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston Status: Complete July 2005 |
|
Farouk Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation
Jurisdiction: US District Court Houston Division Client: Farouk Systems, Inc. Nature Of Case: Farouk Systems claims that Oracle sold a defective ERP software system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Technical consultant. Represented by: Simpson & Brenner-San Diego Status: Complete October, 2004 |
|
Crystal Decisions, Inc. v. Actuate Corporation
Jurisdiction: US Northern District-San Jose Division Client: Crystal Decisions, Inc. Nature Of Case: Crystal Decisions is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to bar Actuate Corporation from making false advertising claims. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Product capability evaluation. Expert presentation. Expert Declarations. Represented by: Hopkins & Carley-San Jose Status: Complete July 2002 |
|
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. And Nissan North America, Inc. v. Nissan Computer Corporation
Jurisdiction: California-Central District Client: Nissan Computer Corporation Nature Of Case: Nissan Computer Corporation operates an Internet website under the registered domain name of nissan.com. Nissan Motor Co. claims Copyright dilution by Nissan Computer Corporation due to its use of the nissan.com domain. Nature Of Engagement: Designated expert. Expert report. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and analyze website traffic logs and statistics. Represented by: Techmark-San Jose, CA Status: Complete November, 2002. |
|
H&S Rehabilitative Treatment Services, Inc. v. da Vinci Motion Graphics
Jurisdiction: OK-Oaklahoma County District Court Client: da Vinci Motion Graphics Nature Of Case: H&S claims misappropriation of trade secrets and violation of a Non-Disclosure Agreement by da Vinci. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. Review features and functions of party's software products. Represented by: Klinge, Brown & Roberts-Oklahoma City, OK Status: Complete April 2002. |
|
Computer Management Consultants, Inc. vs. Computer Information Specialist, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Circuit Court - Tampa Florida Client: Computer Management Consultants, Inc. Nature Of Case: Computer Management Consultants entered into a contract to sell computer software source/object code to Computer Information Specialist. Computer Management Consultants claims that Computer Information Specialist breached the contract by not completing the purchase and using knowledge gained to develop a comparable system. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Represented by: Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa Status: Complete April 2006 |
|
Data Direct Networks, Inc. v. Transoft Technology Corporation
Jurisdiction: Superior Court, State of California - County of Santa Barbara Client: Data Direct Networks, Inc. Nature Of Case: Computer Software Trade Secrets. Data Direct claims theft of trade secrets in the form of computer software for the control of Storage Area Network (SAN) software and business plans by Transoft. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Technical consultant. Analysis of electronic discovery materials. Review and analysis of programming source code, email (including attachments) and system backup data files. Represented by: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete January 2000. |
|
FlexiInternational Software, Inc. - Claimant v. Dataworks, Epicor and Platinum Software
Jurisdiction: California-American Arbitration Association-SF Client: FlexiInternational Software, Inc. Nature Of Case: Parties entered into a software license/development agreement. Parties dispute software development process, features implemented and development schedule. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review project documents, evaluate management of project and contract performance. Represented by: The Banchero Law Firm-San Francisco, CA Status: Complete February 2001. |
|
Multico Rating Systems v. (Name withheld by request)
Jurisdiction: AAA-Washington State Client: Names Confidential Nature Of Case: Trade Secrets. Multico claims that (confidential) used proprietary information to develop competing insurance rating software. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert Expert Report. Represented by: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane Status: Complete January 2005 |
|
National Airmotive v. Oracle Corp., Avanti Systems, Inc., James Greenwood and Gregory Stachnick
Jurisdiction: California-Northern District Client: National Airmotive Corporation, Rolls Royce Nature Of Case: National owns rights to computer source code. Oracle acquired code via. Former employee. National claims that Oracle is marketing a computer system which incorporated its intellectual property. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Program/system source code analysis. Represented by: Anderson Kill & Olick - New York City, NY Status: Complete June 2001. |
|
Large Internet DSL Provider v. International Consulting Firm
Jurisdiction: na Client: Internet DSL Service Provider Nature Of Case: International Consulting Form retained to select, modify, install and implement "back office" systems to support DSL service requirements. Nature Of Engagement: Technical Expert. Expert Computer Consulting and analysis. Evaluate project management system, reporting and status of contract deliverables. Obtain and review machine readable project files, documents and reporting systems. Systems included Siebel, Portal, Vitria and Oracle data bases. Represented by: Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA Status: Complete January 2002 |
|
Solv Corporation v. PurchasePro.com
Jurisdiction: American Arbitration Association - Las Vegas, Nevada Client: Solv Corporation - Altlana, GA Nature Of Case: Solv developed software for PurchasePro.com. Solv alleges that PurchasPro wrongfully terminated contract for Internet eCommerce web site development. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Litigation Support. Review program development standards. Represented by: Weil & Lee-Anaheim, CA Status: Complete September 2001. |
|
SS&C v. AF Investmentos
Jurisdiction: AAA Arbitration - New York Client: AF Investmentos Nature Of Case: Portfolio Management software purchased by AF Investmentos was defective. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Consulting Technical Expert. Evaluate system requirements, technical representations and data base architecture. Review and evaluate project management system, reporting, status and performance. Represented by: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN Status: Complete February 2001 |
|
New England Air Systems, Inc. v. ePartners, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc.
Jurisdiction: MA-State Court Client: epartners Nature Of Case: Contracts dispute involving claims that Solomon software system was defective. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Technical consultant. Represented by: Foley, Hoag & Eliot-Boston, MA Status: Complete March 2002 |
|
Dan Trust v. Hollie B. Smith, Jerome F. Brasch, and Horizon Healthcare Technologies
Jurisdiction: Iowa District Court-Polk County Client: Dan Trusts Nature Of Case: Dan Trust purchased an ownership interest in Horizon Healthcare Technologies. Issues included software system development, project management, system quality and bug reporting and representations made when purchasing a software development company. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Litigation support. Represented by: Dickinson, Mackman, Tyler & Hagen Status: Complete September 2001. |
|
Ladd Industries v. Accunet, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Ohio-Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Client: Confidential Nature Of Case: Ladd purchased Solomon Software system from Accunet. Ladd Industries claims that software was defective and was not suited for its business needs. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and evaluate system requirements, project management and implementation results. Pre-Trial Discovery. Represented by: Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis-Cincinnati, OH Status: Complete May 2002. |
|
Associates in Ophthalmology v. First Insight Corp.
Jurisdiction: US-Pennsylvania-Western District Client: Associates in Ophthalmology, Ltd. Nature Of Case: Software purchased for Ophthalmology group was defective and did not perform as represented. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Represented by: Monte & McGraw-Skippack, PA Status: Complete February 2002. |
|
United States Of America v. Stephen Lynch Stephen Lynch v. Omaha World-Herald Jurisdiction: Nebraska - US District Client: Lynch, Stephen Nature Of Case: Internet Web security. Access to a protected Website without authorization causing damage. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review and analysis of computer hard disk, Analysis of Web Server and Firewall Logs, Represented by: Fitzgerald, Schorr, Barmettler & Brennan-Omaha, NE Status: Criminal Case Complete August 2001 Civil Suit - Complete February 2004. |
|
State Of Washington Pl. v. Michael Leavell Def.
Jurisdiction: Superior Court, State of Washington - County of Okanogan Client: M. Leavell - Defendant Nature Of Case: Internet Pornography. Unlawful Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaged In Sexually Explicit Conduct, RCW 9.68A.070 Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Pre-Trial consulting. Acquisition of computer hard disk. Search for and analyze hard disk contents for email, browser cache contents and other files related to the action. Present testimony concerning the contents and validity of conclusions to be drawn from the contents of the seized hard disk. Represented by: Roger A. Castelda, Inc., P.S-Tonasket WA Status: Complete November 2000. |
|
United States of America v. Anthony Marchand, M.D.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court - New Jersey Client: Anthony Marchand, M.D. Nature Of Case: Internet Child Pornography. Technical issues presented by Ashcroft v. Free Speech Supreme Court Decision where Child Pornography created by virtual means is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media Expert Report. Testimony at Trial Represented by: Epstein, Becker & Green-Newark, NJ Status: Complete October 2003. |
|
United States of America v. Ronald Elmquist
Jurisdiction: US District Court - Western District of Missouri-Western Division Client: Elmquist, R. Nature Of Case: US claims that a computer siezed from Elmquist contained illegal Internet Pornography. Elmquist claims serious chain of custody issues exist with evidence. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Forensic Expert Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media Expert Report Represented by: Wyrsch, Hobbs & Mirakain Status: Pre-Trial discovery. |
|
Michiko Hall v. Rockwell International Corporation
Jurisdiction: Superior Court-County of Los Angeles Client: Michiko Hall Nature Of Case: Employment Discrimination. Unlawful Termination. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Document discovery requirements. Review of Rockwell operations for relevant information in order to prepare production requests. Represented by: Dayton B. Parcells, Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete June 1994 |
|
Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co. v. IP Platform Co.
Jurisdiction: California-Northern District Client: Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co. Nature Of Case: Key employees move to new company. Allegations involve theft of trade secrets and proprietary knowledge. Nature Of Engagement: Consulting Technical Expert. Pre-filing. Examination of computer hard disk contents. Represented by: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA Status: Complete June 2002 |
|
Process Specialties, Inc. - Pl. v. Sematech, Inc. - Def.
Jurisdiction: California-Eastern District Client: Process Specialities, Inc. Nature Of Case: Trade secrets Nature Of Engagement: Technical Expert. Declaration concerning the usability of certain computer file formats as a medium for data produced during discovery phase. Represented by: Herum, Crabtree, Brown, Dyer, Zolezza & Terpstra-Stockton, CA Status: Complete June 2001 |
|
R & R Technologies v. Westerman, Inc.
Jurisdiction: Texas District Court - Nueces County Client: R And R Technologies Nature Of Case: R and R Claims that Westerman pirated computer software and designs for hardware which constituted valuable R & R intellectual property. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Represented by: The Wyatt Law Firm Status: Complete January 2006 |
|
Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa , Morgan v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Jurisdiction: US District-Colorado Client: Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa , Morgan Nature Of Case: Employees were terminated for allegedly violating company policy concerning the use of Email system to transmit sexually explicit material. Nature Of Engagement: Designated Expert. Review Internet communications including email, usage and policies. Represented by: Secor Law-Denver, CO Status: Complete January 2001. |
|
Jaramillo v. Ford Motor Co. et al
Jurisdiction: California-Northern District |
